Judging Process
Our reviews are conducted in a single-blind tasting format. This method provides the best opportunity to rely on facts and to avoid favoritism, ensuring a level playing field for all brewers. It serves both the industry and the consumer to have unbiased and objective scores from qualified experts. To best implement this approach, the Judges Review is open to those with established experience as a Master Cicerone® from the Cicerone® Certification Program or as a judge that has accomplished the rank of National or higher from the Beer Judge Certification Program. In the single-blind tasting format, judges are presented with a chilled, properly poured beer and given its style category. Scoring is then done on the following basis using a 100-point scale:
Score Breakdown:
100 to 96: World Class – You need this beer in your life.
95 to 91: Exceptional – Don’t hesitate.
90 to 86: Very Good – A brew to savor.
85 to 75: Average – Somewhat unimpressive.
74 and below: Not Recommended – Just walk away.
97
by John C. Tull
Four Seasons Winter '16
Mother Earth Brew Co.
View Beer
Read Review
96
by Joseph Formanek
La Trappe Quadrupel Oak-Aged
Trappist Brewery Koningshoeven
View Beer
Read Review
95
by Randy Scorby
Stone 21st Anniversary: Hail to the Hop Thief
Stone Brewing Co.
View Beer
Read Review
95
by Sal Mortillaro II
Reviver Red IPA
Starr Hill Brewery
View Beer
Read Review
95
by Randy Scorby
Alaskan Brewing Amber
Alaskan Brewing Co.
View Beer
Read Review
94
by Lyn Howard
Glorious
Lord Hobo Brewing Co.
View Beer
Read Review
94
by Sal Mortillaro II
Festie Oktoberfest Lager
Starr Hill Brewery
View Beer
Read Review
93
by David Sapsis
Beavers Milk Nitro
Belching Beaver Brewing Co.
View Beer
Read Review
Finish reading this article by becoming a premium member.
Visit the store now. Options start for only $2.00!