Start 14-Day Trial Subscription

*No credit card required

Editorial Dept.'s picture

Beer Review (Issue 23)

 


Judging Process
Our reviews are conducted in a single-blind tasting format. This method provides the best opportunity to rely on facts and to avoid favoritism, ensuring a level playing field for all brewers. It serves both the industry and the consumer to have unbiased and objective scores from qualified experts. To best implement this approach, the Judges Review is open to those with established experience as a Master Cicerone® from the Cicerone® Certification Program or as a judge that has accomplished the rank of National or higher from the Beer Judge Certification Program. In the single blind tasting format, judges are presented with a chilled, properly poured beer and given its style category. Scoring is then done on the following basis using a 100-point scale:


Exceptional (95 to 91)



92

by James Link
Tesseract
Grimm Artisanal Ales

View Beer
Read Review



92

by Rodney A. Tillinghast
Rocky Road
Smuttynose Brewing Co.

View Beer
Read Review

Brewer Q & A



92

by Jim Koebel
Cowcatcher
Smartmouth Brewing Co.

View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A



92

by Susan Ruud
Grandpa Tractor
Barley Forge Brewing Co.

View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A



92

by Tracy Hensley
Double D's
Avery Brewing Co.

View Beer
Read Review

Brewer Q & A



92

by Nelson Crowle
Hotbox Coffee Porter
Oskar Blues Brewery

View Beer
Read Review
Brewer Q & A



92
by Mike Castagno
Good People IPA
Good People Brewing Co.

View Beer
Read Review

Brewer Q & A



92

by Sean Coughlin
Dragon's Milk Reserve with Toasted Chilies
New Holland Brewing Co.

View Beer
Read Review


Pages

Table of Contents